Foreign Investment 2020: CFIUS Spotlight on “TID” U.S. Businesses
Welcome to Mofo Life Sciences
MoFo Life Sciences shares timely legal and business insights and in-depth analyses on trends and the complex technologies at the heart of the global pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics, medical devices, digital health, and AgTech fields.
- FIRRMA directed the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), as the chair of CFIUS, to issue regulations that, among other things, address national security concerns arising from foreign investment in U.S. businesses with critical technologies, critical infrastructure, and personal data (referred to in the... ›
China Patent Eligibility Update: Human Embryonic Stem Cells
On September 23, 2019, China National Intellectual Property Administration (“CNIPA”) announced its proposed amendments to China’s Guideline on Patent Examination (the “Guideline”), which is the counterpart of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure in the U.S. The proposed amendments will become effective November 1,... ›Foreign Investment 2020: Key Takeaways from the “Modernized” CFIUS Regulations
By: Joseph A. Benkert and Charles L. Capito
After more than a year of anticipation, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) has released proposed regulations to implement the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA). These proposed regulations follow an initial round of FIRRMA-implementing regulations issued in October 2018, which most... ›- - AI + Robotics, United States, FDA, Product Liability + Class Action, Pharma, Regulatory, Data Analytics
Artificial Intelligence and Pharma
Bethany Hills authored an article for PHARMAnetwork , covering how the pharmaceutical industry has been adopting artificial intelligence and machine learning. Bethany discusses that the pharmaceutical sector has been one of the more robust areas where private partnerships with artificial intelligence-based technology companies have... › Morrison & Foerster Launches Complimentary Tracker For Northern District Of California IP Cases
We are pleased to announce the launch of the MoFo NDCal IP Resource Center. This complimentary resource is available to the public and provides insights on the judges, trends, and decisions for intellectual property cases for the last five years in the United States... ›Analyzing Biologics Under the Doctrine of Equivalents and Prosecution History Estoppel
By: Janet Xiao Ph.D. and Meghan McLean Poon Ph.D.
In a recent decision, Ajinomoto v. ITC , the Federal Circuit addressed the issues of doctrine of equivalents and prosecution history estoppel as applied to patent claims reciting specific amino acid sequence of a biologic. On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision by... ›AI Patent Policy – Calling all Life Sciences Practitioners
By: Anna Yuan and Karen G Potter Ph.D.
In the life sciences, artificial intelligence (AI) may be facilitating a sea change in how diseases are diagnosed, prognosed, and treated, and even how therapies are discovered and produced. Indeed, it is possible for AI to provide insights into disease and treatment that could... ›MoFo Hosts “Israeli Innovation in Healthcare” Event in Palo Alto
By: Shiri V. Shenhav, Bradley D. Wine and Shai Kalansky
Last week, Morrison & Foerster’s Israel practice hosted a program in our Palo Alto office titled, “Israeli Innovation in Healthcare,” in collaboration with the Israel Economic Mission to the West Coast. The program featured Professor Karen Avraham, Vice Dean of Tel Aviv University’s Faculty... ›CJEU on Genuine-Use of Trademarks in Clinical Trials
By: Wolfgang Schönig and Robert Grohmann
The pharmaceutical market presents unique challenges to pharmaceutical companies seeking to launch new products. One such challenge involves the lengthy process of executing clinical trials as a prerequisite for obtaining market authorization. In this context, the fact that trademark laws in most jurisdictions provide... ›China’s new administrative regulations on human genetic resources as applied to foreign persons
The Administrative Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Human Genetic Resources (the “Regulations”), promulgated by China’s State Council, went into effect on July 1, 2019, superseding prior regulations on China’s human genetic resources (“China HGR”), particularly the 1998 Interim Methods of Human... ›