Keeping pace with the ever-changing life sciences industry, Morrison Foerster stays on top of the trends and political, legal, and economic drivers to support striking the balance between innovative discovery and purposeful business planning to assure our clients continued success. MoFo Life Sciences shares timely legal and business insights and in-depth analyses on trends and the complex technologies at the heart of the global pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics, medical devices, digital health, and AgTech fields.Learn more about our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/capabilities/life-sciences-healthcare" target="_self">Life Sciences practice</a>.<h2 dir="ltr">ABOUT MORRISON FOERSTER</h2>Morrison Foerster is a leading global law firm that transforms complexity into advantage for its clients. Our clients include some of the largest financial institutions, banks, consulting and accounting firms, and Fortune 100, technology, and life sciences companies. Highlighting the firm’s commitment to client service, leadership in market-changing deals and impact litigation, and values-based culture, Morrison Foerster has been repeatedly recognized as one of the top 10 firms on The American Lawyer’s A-List. Year after year, the firm receives significant recognition from Chambers and The Legal 500 across their various guides, including Global, USA, Asia‑Pacific, Europe, UK, Latin America, and FinTech Legal. Our lawyers passionately care about delivering legal excellence while living our values. Morrison Foerster has a long-standing commitment to creating a culture that respects and celebrates differences, while providing an inclusive environment. The firm has achieved Mansfield Certification Plus since 2018 as a result of successfully reaching at least 30 percent women, communities of color, and LGBTQ+ lawyer representation in a notable number of current leadership roles and committees. The firm also has a long history of commitment to the community and society through providing pro bono legal services, including litigating for civil rights and civil liberties, improving public education and fostering the wellbeing of children, advocating for veterans, promoting international human rights, enforcing the right to asylum, and safeguarding the environment.

Social

Search

Subscribe

Life Sciences and Healthcare Group

Life Sciences Podcast

Patent Counseling + Prosecution

FDA Regulatory + Life Sciences Compliance

FDA + Healthcare Regulatory and Compliance 

Life Sciences Transactions + Licensing

Resources

Editors

230315-new-mofo-life-sciences-logo.jpg

Dr. Meghan Poon counsels clients on patent preparation and prosecution, portfolio strategy, and IP due diligence in the areas of biotechnology and biologics. She has significant experience in diverse technologies including antibodies, cell therapies, gene therapies, diagnostics, and gene-edited plants. She represents clients ranging from large international pharmaceutical companies to midsized companies, startups, and universities.Meghan has filed numerous Patent Term Extension applications to secure additional term for her clients’ patents, which cover FDA-approved products. In addition, Meghan has extensive experience addressing complex obviousness-double patenting and subject matter eligibility issues impacting her clients’ patent portfolios. Meghan also represents clients in both investor-side and target-side due diligence, in deals from seed funding to initial public offerings.Prior to law school, Meghan attended graduate school at the University of California, Los Angeles, where she received a Ph.D. in biological chemistry based on her work on protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions at a molecular level. Meghan is the author of several scientific publications and has presented her research at international conferences.Meghan received her J.D. from the University of Southern California Law School and spent a year as a visiting student at Santa Clara University, where she focused on intellectual property.

poon_meghan_blog_150x150.png

poon_meghan_common_640x280.jpg

poon_meghan_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

poon_meghan_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

poon_meghan_social_600x600.jpg

Partner

Dr. Meghan Poon counsels clients on patent preparation and prosecution, portfolio strategy, and IP due diligence in the areas of biotechnology and biologics. She has significant experience in diverse technologies including antibodies, cell therapies, gene therapies, diagnostics, and gene-edited plants.

Meghan Poon

Wolfgang advises clients on contentious and non-contentious matters involving their most valuable intellectual property assets in life sciences, digital, and high-tech industries.His subjects of focus include research and development collaborations, complex licensing agreements, and other technology transactions, as well as know-how protection strategies, and employee invention law. He also has substantial experience in litigating patents, trademarks, and other intellectual property assets, often in a multijurisdictional context. In addition, Wolfgang and his team frequently clear trademarks and ad campaigns and prosecute trademark applications.Wolfgang is co-editor of our <a href="https://lifesciences.mofo.com/" dir="ltr" target="_blank">MoFo Life Sciences Blog</a>.Wolfgang is a partner of Morrison Foerster based in our German office in Berlin.<h4 dir="ltr">Representative Transactional Matters</h4><ul dir="ltr"><li>U.S.-based BioTech fund on various research collaborations and other transactions with German start-ups or research institutions.</li><li>Negotiate multimillion-euro strategic partnership between two AgTech leaders concerning the development and commercialization of pest-resistant transgenic traits.</li><li>Craft global multi-million collaboration regarding AI-powered robotic MaaS.</li><li>UK-based digital health company on product roll-out of RPM applications in Germany; coordinate international expansion.</li><li>Advise numerous German start-ups on their U.S. expansion.</li><li>Draft diverse global patent and know-how license agreements in the areas of AgTech and life sciences—including gene licensing and licensing of genome editing technologies (e.g., CRISPR)—and medical devices; draft correlating supply and distribution agreements.</li><li>Structure IP rights in connection with joint ventures and other M&A transactions, including the carve-out of a patent-heavy semiconductor business comprising nine jurisdictions into a German–U.S. joint venture.</li><li dir="ltr">Advise on government-funded, multi-partner R&D projects and/or R&D projects with academic institutions, as well as on employee invention law.</li></ul><h4 dir="ltr">Representative Contentious IP Matters</h4><ul dir="ltr"><li>Lead counsel in an international dispute between software companies on rights and obligations following termination of a multi-million licensing and distribution arrangement; coordinate local counsel.</li><li>Defend Japanese chip manufacturer in high-profile SEP-litigation; advise on global settlement arrangement.</li><li>Represent leading internet retailer in patent infringement and concurrent invalidity proceedings in the context of a multijurisdictional dispute concerning touch-screen technology.</li><li>Represent diverse pharmaceutical and life sciences companies in national and cross-border patent infringement proceedings and other technology-related disputes, including preliminary injunctions as well as pre‑trial discovery and inspection proceedings, concerning, inter alia, drug-coating technologies, toner cartridges, medicinal gases, transgenic plants, and vaccines.</li><li dir="ltr">Conduct trademark, copyright, and false advertising litigation, including, most notably, a high-profile trademark litigation for a German bank, and a nine-country cross-border trademark litigation involving a famous pharmaceutical brand.</li></ul>

Dr. Wolfgang Schönig berät Mandanten zum Schutz des geistigen Eigentums sowohl in streitigen als auch nichtstreitigen Angelegenheiten, mit einem besonderen Fokus auf die IP-rechtliche Beratung von Unternehmen aus den Bereichen Life Sciences, Digitalwirtschaft und High-Tech.Zu seinen Beratungsschwerpunkten gehören Forschungs- und Entwicklungskooperationen, komplexe Lizenzvertragsgestaltungen und andereTechnologie-Transaktionen, sowie Know-how-Schutz-Strategien und das Arbeitnehmererfinderrecht. Er verfügt zudem über umfangreiche Prozesserfahrung zur Durchsetzung von Patenten, Marken- und anderen IP-Rechten, häufig auch in einem grenzüberschreitenden Kontext. Darüber hinaus bewertet Dr. Wolfgang Schönig zusammen mit seinem Team regelmäßig die Rechtskonformität von Werbekampagnen, prüft die Verfügbarkeit von Marken und entwickelt entsprechende Anmeldestrategien.Dr. Wolfgang Schönig ist Co-Editor des Life Sciences Blogs von Morrison Foerster.Er hat seinen Doktortitel an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf und seinen LL.M. an der Fordham School of Law in New York erworben, jeweils mit Schwerpunkt im gewerblichen Rechtsschutz. Seinen MBA-Abschluss erhielt er von der European University in Barcelona.Dr. Wolfgang Schönig ist Partner des deutschen Büros von Morrison Foerster in Berlin.<h4 dir="ltr">Repräsentative Transaktionen</h4><ul><li dir="ltr">BioTech-Fonds mit Sitz in den USA bei verschiedenen Forschungskooperationen und anderen Transaktionen mit deutschen Start-ups oder Forschungseinrichtungen</li><li dir="ltr">Verhandlung einer hochvolumigen strategischen Partnerschaft zwischen zwei Technologieführern im Bereich Crop Science betreffend der Entwicklung und Kommerzialisierung von bestimmten Resistenzen</li><li dir="ltr">Gestaltung einer globalen Multi-Millionen-Zusammenarbeit für KI-gestützte Roboter</li><li dir="ltr">Ein in Großbritannien ansässiges Unternehmen für digitale Gesundheit bei der Markteinführung von RPM-Anwendungen in Deutschland; Koordination der internationalen Expansion</li><li dir="ltr">Beratung zahlreicher deutscher Start-ups bei deren US-Expansion</li><li dir="ltr">Strukturierung und Verhandlung diverser Patent- und Know-How-Lizenzen in den Bereichen Ag Tech und Life Sciences – einschließlich Fragen zu genome editing wie CRISPR-Medizingeräte, sowie Gestaltung von Softwarelizenzverträgen und Erstellung korrespondierender Liefer- und Vertriebsvereinbarungen</li><li dir="ltr">Strukturierung von IP-Rechten im Zusammenhang mit Joint Ventures und anderen M&A-Transaktionen, darunter die Koordination eines neun Länder umfassenden IP Carve-Outs im Rahmen eines Halbleiter-JVs</li><li dir="ltr">Beratung zu staatlich geförderten Multi-Partner F&E-Projekten und/oder F&E-Projekten mit akademischen Einrichtungen sowie zum Arbeitnehmererfindungsrecht</li></ul><h4 dir="ltr">Repräsentative IP-Streitigkeiten</h4><ul><li dir="ltr">Lead Counsel in einem internationalen Rechtsstreit zwischen Softwareunternehmen über Rechte und Pflichten nach Beendigung einer millionenschweren Lizenz- und Vertriebsvereinbarung; Koordinierung der lokalen Anwälte</li><li dir="ltr">Verteidigung eines japanischen Chipherstellers in einem prominenten Streitfall bezüglich Standardessentieller Patente (SEP); Beratung zu einer globalen Vergleichsregelung</li><li dir="ltr">Verteidigung einer führenden Internetplattform gegen Ansprüche eines Patenttrolls wegen vermeintlicher Verletzung von Patent bezüglich Touchscreen-Technologie sowie korrespondierende US-Streitigkeiten</li><li dir="ltr">Vertretung von Pharma- und Life Science-Unternehmen in nationalen und grenzüberschreitenden Patentverletzungsverfahren und anderen technologiebezogenen Streitigkeiten, einschließlich einstweiliger Verfügungsverfahren und vorprozessualer Beweissicherungs- und Besichtigungsverfahren, unter anderem in Bezug auf Arzneimittelbeschichtungstechnologien, Tonerkartuschen, medizinische Gase, transgene Pflanzen und Impfstoffe</li></ul>

schonig_wolfgang_blog_150x150.png

schonig_wolfgang_common_640x280.jpg

schonig_wolfgang_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

schonig_wolfgang_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

schonig_wolfgang_social_600x600.jpg

Wolfgang Schönig is a partner of Morrison Foerster (International) LLP based in our German office in Berlin. His practice specialty is advising on IP aspects relative to transactions in, among others, the life sciences, AgTech and pharmaceuticals industry, as well as legal representation in IP disputes. Wolfgang is specialized in research and development collaborations, complex licensing agreements, technology acquisitions, know-how protection strategies, and employee invention law.

Wolfgang Schönig focuses his practice on IP aspects relative to transactions in the digital, telecoms, high tech, life sciences, and pharmaceuticals industry, as well as legal representation in IP disputes.

Wolfgang Schönig advises clients on IP aspects relating to transactions in, among others, the life sciences, AgTech and pharmaceuticals industry, as well as legal representation in IP disputes. His additional focus areas include research and development collaborations, complex licensing agreements, technology acquisitions, know-how protection strategies, and employee invention law.

Wolfgang Schönig

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

MoFo Life Sciences shares timely legal and business insights and in-depth analyses on trends and the complex technologies at the heart of the global pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics, medical devices, digital health, and AgTech fields.

life-sciences-featured-image.jpg

life-sciences-featured-image

Announcements

Welcome to Mofo Life Sciences

Blog - Terms of Use

Cookies

Blog - Privacy Policy

Blog - Blog Disclaimer

Blog - Attorney Advertising

morrison-foerster-blog-logo.png

Brings together legal insights and in-depth analyses on trends and complex issues shaping the global technology industry.

MoFo Tech Blog

MOFO TECH

Equips our clients with the most up-to-date and relevant information on employment and labor law issues.

Employment Law Commentary

EMPLOYMENT LAW COMMENTARY

Stay on top of emerging issues and stay informed of developments related to the law and business of social media.

Socially Aware

SOCIALLY AWARE

In-depth analysis of developments and trends impacting government contracting.

Government Contracts Insights Blog

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS INSIGHTS

Provides insights and reports on the most current class actions lawsuits and product liability issues that affect consumer-facing companies.

Class Dismissed Blog

CLASS DISMISSED

MoFo Life Sciences

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

Life Sciences Blog - RSS

Stay Connected

Never miss a post from MoFo Life Sciences. Enter your email below to stay up-to-date.

Because No One is Immune to the Law

Morrison Foerster - Footer

Blogs -  Home Button

Home

Blog - Topics

AI + Robotics

Agtech

Antitrust

Asia

Bioinformatics

Biotech

Blockchain

Cell + Gene Therapy

CFIUS

Corporate + Venture Capital

COVID-19

Data Analytics

Digital Health

Employment

European Union

Financing

Global

Healthcare

Intellectual Property

Licensing + Commercial

Litigation

Medical Devices + Diagnostics

Pharma

Privacy + Data Security

Product Liability + Class Action

Rare Disease

Regulatory

Startup

United Kingdom

United States

Topics

Blog - Editors

Blog - About

About

Blog - Subscribe

Meghan McLean Poon Ph.D.

More

USPTO Fee Changes for 2025

An InSECURE Future: Court Ruling Guts USDA Regs on Genetically Engineered Plants

Uspto Withdraws Consideration of Controversial Change to Terminal Disclaimer Practice

Patent Term Extension for Medical Devices

Patent vs. Trade Secret Considerations for Cell and Gene Therapies

LinkedIN

On May 3, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into <a href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/A3007" target="_blank">law</a> an amendment to the New York Public Health Law that will require certain healthcare entities to provide the State Department of Health (DOH) with written notice and supporting documentation of “material transactions” at least 30 days before closing. This new law will require healthcare entities, such as management service organizations, physician practices, and other similar entities, to submit notice and supporting documentation to DOH when engaging in mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions in New York. Here are four key points from the new law:1. How does the enacted legislation differ from the initial proposal? The original proposed legislation gave DOH broad authority to both review and approve material transactions and allowed DOH to define what transactions are material. See our previous blog post <a href="https://lifesciences.mofo.com/topics/states-extend-scope-of-regulatory-oversight-of-health-care-entities" target="_blank">here.</a> The enacted legislation pulls back on this authority and does not grant DOH the ability to approve transactions and also excludes “de minimis” transactions from review. De minimis transactions in this context are those that result in a healthcare entity increasing its total gross in-state revenues by less than $25 million.[1]2. Definition of “Material Transactions.” The law defines “material transactions” as any of the following:(1) a merger with a healthcare entity(2) an acquisition of one or more healthcare entities, including, but not limited to, the assignment, sale, or other conveyance of assets, voting securities, membership or partnership interest, or the transfer of control(3) an affiliation agreement or contract formed between a healthcare entity and another person(4) the formation of a partnership, joint venture, accountable care organization, parent organization, or management services organization for the purpose of administering contracts with health plans, third-party administrators, pharmacy benefit managers, or healthcare providers as prescribed by the commissioner by regulation.[2]3. Exclusions from Review. In addition to de minimis transactions mentioned above, the law excludes the following transactions from review: clinical affiliations of healthcare entities formed with the intent to facilitate collaboration between the entities (i.e., collaboration on clinical trials), transactions already subject to the Certificate of Need (CON) process, or an insurance entity approval process under the New York Public Health or Insurance Laws.4. Notice Requirements. The notice and review process will be further defined in regulations promulgated by DOH. Written notices must have information including, but not limited to, name and address of the transaction parties, copies of the definitive agreements, locations impacted by the transactions, closing date, and description of the purpose of the transaction, including anticipated impacts on cost, quality, and access in the impacted markets.[3] Upon receipt of a transaction notice, DOH will submit the notice to various bureaus of the Office of the New York Attorney General and post a summary of the proposed transaction on its website with an opportunity for public comment. 5. Noncompliance Consequences. DOH may impose a civil penalty of $2,000 for each day that a transaction is out of compliance. This penalty may be increased up to $5,000 for subsequent violations that pose a “serious threat to the health and safety” of individuals.[4] Each day that the violation continues is a separate violation and the penalty may extend until and unless a notice is filed.ConclusionAlthough the law is less onerous than what had been originally proposed, it does impose obligations on a broad array of entities, including management services organizations, in an attempt to monitor investments and other activities in the healthcare industry. [1] NY Pub. Health L. § 4550(4)(b).[2] NY Pub. Health L. § 4550(4)(a).[3] NY Pub. Health L. § 4552(1).[4] NY Pub. Health L. § 4552(4); NY Pub. Health L. § 12.

220923-content.jpg

220923-content

On May 3, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law an amendment to the New York Public Health Law that will require certain healthcare entities to provide the State Department of Health (DOH) with written notice and supporting documentation of “material transactions” at least 30 days before closing. This new law will require healthcare entities, such as management service organizations, physician practices, and other similar entities, to submit notice and supporting documentation to DOH when engaging in mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions in New York. 

New York Enacts Material Healthcare Transactions Notice Requirements: Four Key Takeaways

On April 13, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sent approximately 670 <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Substantiaton-NPO.pdf" target="_blank">notices of penalty offenses</a> to various companies involved in the marketing of OTC drugs, homeopathic products, dietary supplements, and functional foods, placing them on notice that they could incur significant civil penalties if they fail to adequately substantiate product claims. The <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Sample-cover-letter-substantiaton.pdf" target="_blank">cover letters</a> suggest that the recipients consult FTC staff’s recently issued <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Health-Products-Compliance-Guidance.pdf" target="_blank">Health Products Compliance Guidance</a>. The letter to the recipient companies also provides a copy of a <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/penalty-offenses-concerning-endorsements/notice-penalty_offenses-endorsements.pdf" target="_blank">previously approved notice of penalty offenses</a> regarding the use of endorsement and testimonials. Notices of penalty offenses allow the agency to seek civil penalties up to $50,120 per violation against companies that engage in conduct they know has been found unlawful in a previous FTC administrative order. The FTC warned that it will not hesitate to use its authority to target violators with large civil penalties. Companies receiving this warning from the FTC include companies that sell cosmetics, personal care products, food, drugs, devices, and dietary supplements.The FTC requires that companies substantiate product claims with reliable evidence. The Notice of Penalty Offenses Concerning Substantiation of Product Claims stated that the following acts or practices in the advertising and promotion of products are deceptive or unfair and unlawful under Section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act:<ul><li>Making an objective product claim without having a reasonable basis at the time the claim is made consisting of competent and reliable evidence;</li><li>Making a claim regarding the health benefits or safety of a product without having as substantiation competent and reliable scientific evidence that has been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by qualified persons, and that is generally accepted in the profession;</li><li>Representing expressly or implicitly that a product is effective in the cure, mitigation, or treatment of any serious disease (e.g., heart disease, cancer, arthritis, erectile dysfunction) without having and relying on at least one human clinical trial that (1) is randomized, (2) is well controlled, (3) is double-blinded (unless demonstrated that blinding cannot be effectively implemented given the nature of the intervention), (4) is conducted by persons qualified by training and experience to conduct such studies, (5) measures disease end points or validated surrogate markers, and (6) yields statistically significant result;</li><li>Misrepresenting the level of type of substantiation for a claim; and</li><li>Representing that a product claim has been scientifically or clinically proven unless, at the time of representation, the advertiser possesses and relies upon evidence sufficient to satisfy the relevant scientific community of the claim’s truth.</li></ul>The initial distribution of the notice is limited to those companies making health claims or those likely to make health claims considering their product types. However, the FTC stressed that the notice is not limited to health claims and will apply to any entity making claims about the efficacy or performance of its products. While it does not suggest a company has engaged in deceptive or unfair conduct, inclusion on the list demonstrates at the very least that the FTC is aware of the company and the company’s products.Morrison Foerster’s regulatory and class action litigation teams work seamlessly to advise clients on compliance and product claims. Please contact the authors if you have questions.

bondoc_brigid_blog_150x150.png

bondoc_brigid_common_640x280.jpg

bondoc_brigid_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

bondoc_brigid_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

bondoc_brigid_social_600x600.jpg

Brigid is a food, drug, and medical device lawyer who counsels life sciences companies on a wide range of U.S. Food & Drug Administration pre- and post-market regulatory issues.

Brigid DeCoursey Bondoc

Brigid is a food, drug, and medical device lawyer who counsels life sciences companies on a wide range of U.S. Food & Drug Administration pre- and post-market regulatory issues.

Brigid Bondoc

Claudia focuses her practice on the defense of consumer class actions and on complex commercial litigation, including unfair business competition, false advertising, product liability, and privacy mat

Claudia Vetesi

Claudia focuses her practice on the defense of consumer class actions and on complex commercial litigation, including unfair business competition, false advertising, product liability, and privacy matters. She is currently representing numerous consumer goods manufacturers and retailers in false advertising and mislabeling class actions.

Claudia M. Vetesi

230305-abstract-lights.jpg

FTC Issues Notice of Penalty Offenses on Substantiation of Product Claims

230305-abstract-lights

On April 13, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sent approximately 670 notices of penalty offenses to various companies involved in the marketing of OTC drugs, homeopathic products, dietary supplements, and functional foods, placing them on notice that they could incur significant civil penalties if they fail to adequately substantiate product claims. 

FTC Issues Notice of Penalty Offenses on Substantiation of Product Claims

Morrison & Foerster is pleased to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/news/200417-mofo-expands-corporate-capabilities.html">announce</a> the continued expansion of its New York office and global Corporate Department capabilities with the arrival of corporate partner Mitchell Presser. He joins the firm as a partner in its Mergers + Acquisitions and Private Equity Investments + Buyouts practices and will serve as co-chair of the firm’s Global Corporate Department.Mitchell Presser brings to the firm 30 years of experience in public and private mergers and acquisitions, with a heavy concentration on private equity transactions. Clients across wide-ranging sectors call on Mitchell for his vast experience, as both a lawyer and a principal, executing high-profile M&A and private equity transactions that lead to successful outcomes. He has worked across asset classes, including agriculture, food, financial services, industrials, insurance, sports and entertainment, energy and retail.Mitchell was previously a founding partner of Paine Schwartz Partners (formerly Paine & Partners), a leading U.S. private equity firm managing a $1.2 billion fund focused on investing in food and agriculture. Having served as an investor for more than eight years, Mitchell’s understanding of both the legal and business environments enables him to provide a unique perspective to clients.His joining Morrison & Foerster strengthens the firm’s already robust M&A and private equity global footprint and highlights the continued commitment to growth of the firm’s capabilities and growth in New York.<a target="_blank" href="https://www2.mofo.com/e/323401/people-mitchell-presser-html/5kcrn/164503921?h=gZLF55mZesojIu0CZhQ6YbogQbQXb_i0sgph26DVG0c">Mitchell Presser</a> Co-Chair, Global Corporate Department New York (212) 336-4432 <a href="mailto:mpresser@mofo.com">mpresser@mofo.com</a>

Mitchell Presser advises on high-profile global public and private mergers and acquisitions, with a heavy concentration on private equity transactions.

Mitchell S. Presser

Mitchell Presser

presser_mitchell_social_600x600.jpg

Morrison & Foerster Expands Corporate Capabilities Adding New Corporate Co-Chair Mitchell Presser

Morrison & Foerster Expands Corporate Capabilities Adding New Corporate Co-Chair Mitchell Presser

presser_mitchell_social_600x600

Morrison & Foerster is pleased to announce the continued expansion of its New York office and global Corporate Department capabilities with the arrival of corpo

Last month, Dr. Stephen Hahn was officially sworn in as the new commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Senate confirmed him by a 73-17 vote. Hahn became the fourth leader of FDA in 2019 and the first confirmed nominee since former Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb resigned unexpectedly in April and was followed by two temporary acting commissioners. Under a permanent commissioner, we will likely see more consistent and future-oriented policy agendas and programs, but the 2020 presidential election may threaten Hahn’s extended tenure as commissioner—a position nominated by the president with no fixed term. Hahn will most likely be compared to Dr. Gottlieb, the well liked and effective communicator. Hahn’s specific strategies and goals for the agency are not yet clear, but his experience as a researcher, practitioner, and administrator will give him valuable insight to take on the issues currently facing FDA. With a specialization in radiation oncology, he was most recently the Chief Medical Executive at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, which has over 20,000 employees, runs on an annual budget of over $5 billion, and currently ranks as the top cancer center in the United States. Hahn earned respect as a skilled leader after becoming Chief Operating Officer of M.D. Anderson in 2017. At the time, the medical center was suffering major financial losses, but it became profitable merely months after Hahn stepped into the role. Before that, he was a professor, research director, and chief of the Radiation Oncology Department at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. Hahn has also treated patients as a clinician. Despite his familiarity with running a large healthcare organization, he has never worked in government and his regulatory philosophy is largely unknown. He also has no notable ties to large pharmaceutical companies—a concern raised during Gottlieb’s confirmation process in 2017.Already on Hahn’s future agenda is teen vaping, which has garnered extensive media and government scrutiny due to a rising number of vaping-related illnesses and deaths. Although e‑cigarette products have been targeted by proposed state and federal legislation, they also fall under FDA’s regulatory authority. During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, Hahn was questioned extensively about his position on a potential ban of flavored tobacco products. The Trump administration proposed the ban on flavored e‑cigarettes earlier this year, but retreated from implementing it before finally settling on a compromise position of banning some but not all flavored e-cigarette cartridges. Despite calling teen tobacco use an “urgent crisis in this country” and saying that “aggressive action needs to be taken to protect our children,” Hahn was similarly noncommittal to the ban. The cancer doctor’s refusal to take a clear stance on the issue led some committee members to question whether Hahn will remain objective against pressure from President Trump and industry lobbyists.In addition to e‑cigarette use, the HELP Committee expressed concerns about generic drug approval and availability, FDA’s framework for assessing cannabidiol‑based medical products, and ongoing management of the opioid crisis. Hahn’s approach to those issues remains to be seen, but he has promised to use “science and data” to guide his decisions as the next FDA Commissioner. Gottlieb, still a prominent voice in the industry, has continued to criticize the current CBD supplement and beverage industry, outside FDA. We will continue to monitor and report on Commissioner Hahn’s impacts on the regulatory landscape alongside other novel FDA regulation and compliance issues, and expect 2020 to be an exciting year as we all get to know him and understand his approach and priorities.

Julie Park provides analytic and strategic counsel for issues in product life cycle, product liability and defective products, consumer class actions, and more.

Julie Park

Julie Park | Product Liability Lawyer

Julie Park protects her clients’ products no matter what kind of product issue they face—whether it is planning for new product development, recalling an existing product, or defending clients against product liability or consumer class actions. Drawing on her deep technical and legal expertise, Julie counsels clients on consumer product safety regulation and pharmaceutical and medical device preemption while also managing complex and multijurisdictional litigation both in state and federal court.

Julie Y. Park

mofolifesciences-intellectual-property.jpg

2020 Under Dr. Stephen Hahn, FDA’s New Commissioner

mofolifesciences-intellectual-property

Last month, Dr. Stephen Hahn was officially sworn in as the new commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Senate confirmed him by a 73-17

2020 Under Dr. Stephen Hahn, FDA’s New Commissioner

Morrison & Foerster, a leading global law firm, is pleased to announce that it has opened an office in <a href="https://www.mofo.com/offices/boston.html">Boston</a> to further extend its market-leading technology and life sciences capabilities. The move also expands the firm’s premier Finance and Emerging Companies and Venture Capital (ECVC) practices. Additionally, the new office will strengthen existing transactional, private equity, real estate, and intellectual property (IP) practices.Morrison & Foerster’s initial expansion includes adding a group of 23 finance attorneys from a Boston headquartered boutique finance firm. That team brings a leading commercial lending practice focused on the technology and life sciences sectors, and subscription lending. It includes eight partners: David Ephraim, who also becomes the Office Managing Partner in Boston; Charles (Chuck) Stavros; Beth Tunstall; David Givner; Joseph O’Donnell; Jonathan Jacobs (joining in New York); Alexander Rheaume; and Gregory Bilton.Ori Solomon, a leading ECVC lawyer, has also joined the firm’s Boston office as a partner and Co-Chair of the ECVC practice. Mr. Solomon primarily serves clients operating and investing in the life sciences and technology sectors that are located in Boston, New York, and the San Francisco Bay Area. He was previously at Proskauer Rose, where he was hiring partner for the Boston office.“We are a premier global firm that leads on market-shaping technology and life sciences matters and offers innovative solutions to our clients. It is a natural extension and synergy for us to open an office in Boston, a city known as a hub for innovation and technology and the epicenter for life sciences on the East Coast,” said Morrison & Foerster chair Larren Nashelsky. “We are committed to growing aggressively to meet the needs of our clients. Establishing a significant presence in Boston further builds on our momentum following our two most successful years ever, which included continuing to work on complex, headline-grabbing matters for clients such as SoftBank and Novartis.”The new office complements Morrison & Foerster’s strong presence in other markets in the U.S., such as the San Francisco Bay Area, New York, the Washington, D.C. region, and Southern California. Establishing an office in Boston further enhances the firm’s global platform as well, which includes five offices in Asia and three offices in Europe. It also provides an opportunity to the many life sciences and technology companies located in the Boston area to access Morrison & Foerster’s outstanding global life sciences and technology offerings.Morrison & Foerster’s 29,000 square foot office located at 200 Clarendon Street (the “Hancock Tower”) in the Back Bay area of Boston, is now home to more than 30 lawyers, with room for significant future growth. In addition to the attorneys who have just joined Morrison & Foerster, the new office houses several of the firm’s existing lawyers who have been regularly working in the Boston area, including Privacy + Data Security partner Julie O’Neill, a Real Estate team led by partner Thomas McGovern and Of Counsel Guy McPherson, Business Restructuring + Insolvency Group partner Dennis Jenkins, and State + Local Tax Of Counsel Philip Olsen. Also joining the Boston office is Mike Ward, long-time partner in Morrison & Foerster’s San Francisco office. Dr. Ward has chaired the firm’s Patent Group and has co-chaired the IP Practice since 2008, and is the foremost figure in the field of plant IP and agricultural biotechnology.

190425-boston-grows.jpg

Morrison & Foerster Opens Boston Office, Further Expanding Premier Technology and Life Sciences Capabilities

Morrison & Foerster Opens Boston Office, Further Expanding Premier Technology and Life Sciences Capabilities

190425-boston-grows

Morrison & Foerster, a leading global law firm, is pleased to announce that it has opened an office in Boston to further extend its market-leading technology an

MoFo Life Sciences shares timely legal and business insights and in-depth analyses on trends and the complex technologies at the heart of the global pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics, medical devices, digital health, and AgTech fields.

Welcome to MoFo Life Sciences

MoFo Life Sciences shares timely legal and business insights and in-depth analyses on trends and the complex technologies at the heart of the global pharmaceuti