MoFo Life Sciences

July 20, 2023 - Intellectual Property, Litigation, Pharma, Biotech, United States
Obviousness in Drug Combinations – Unexpected Results Vs. Unexpected Mechanisms of Action
By: Mark D. McBriar Ph.D., Bu Yin Ph.D. and Ashley E. Sperbeck
Ascertaining the differences between prior art and claims at issue requires interpreting the claim language and considering both the invention and the prior art references as a whole. [1] The Supreme Court emphasized “the need for caution in granting a patent based on the
... ›
July 10, 2023 - Cell + Gene Therapy, Biotech, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Pharma
Mitigating Patent Risk in Gene Therapy Development
By: Daralyn Durie, Janet Xiao Ph.D. and Katherine E. McNutt
This article was first published by IAM on June 2, 2023 in its Special Report 2023 Q2: New Frontiers of Pharma and Biotech IP Strategy. Daralyn Durie, Janet Xiao and Katherine McNutt of Morrison Foerster explore strategies to reduce the threat of infringement liability
... ›
June 21, 2023 - Litigation, Healthcare, United States
Supreme Court: U.S. Government Has Broad Discretion to Dismiss False Claims Act Suits
By: J. Alex Ward, Demme Doufekias, Adam L. Braverman and Joseph R. Palmore
On June 16, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a decision in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. , giving the United States government broad power to dismiss qui tam FCA lawsuits even when it has initially declined to intervene. We have
... ›
June 20, 2023 - Biotech, Pharma, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Cell + Gene Therapy
Practical Strategies for Protecting Innovations Under the Doctrine of Equivalents
By: Kelsey J. Roberts Kingman Ph.D. and Bu Yin Ph.D.
Recent case law highlights enablement and written description challenges for genus claims.[1] Given the challenges of enforcing genus claims, the doctrine of equivalents (DOE) may become a more important tool for patentees when literal infringement is unavailable. As discussed below, the outlook for successful
... ›
June 16, 2023 - Intellectual Property, Litigation, United States, Biotech, Pharma
Five Questions after Amgen v. Sanofi
By: Meghan McLean Poon Ph.D. and Kelsey J. Roberts Kingman Ph.D.
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Amgen v. Sanofi puts a spotlight on enablement of functionally defined claims. Future developments may shed light on a number of remaining questions for patent applicants. Here are five areas to watch: 1. What is the impact on
... ›
June 12, 2023 - Intellectual Property, Litigation, Digital Health, Healthcare, United States
United States Supreme Court: Look to Defendant's Subjective Beliefs to Decide Whether It "Knowingly" Submitted False Claim
By: Joseph R. Palmore, J. Alex Ward and Adam L. Braverman
On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a decision in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc. , clarifying when a defendant “knowingly” submits a false claim for payment under the False Claims Act (FCA). The Court held that a defendant that submits
... ›
May 03, 2023 - Announcements, Healthcare, Litigation, Regulatory, United States, FDA
FTC Issues Notice of Penalty Offenses on Substantiation of Product Claims
By: Brigid DeCoursey Bondoc and Claudia M. Vetesi
On April 13, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sent approximately 670 notices of penalty offenses to various companies involved in the marketing of OTC drugs, homeopathic products, dietary supplements, and functional foods, placing them on notice that they could incur significant civil penalties
... ›
April 21, 2023 - Intellectual Property, Litigation, Pharma, Biotech, United States
Is DOE Now in Vogue?
By: Matthew A. Chivvis and Qiwen Zhong Ph.D.
On March 27, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi , a closely watched case on the issue of enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a). Though not the main point of contention, the doctrine of equivalents (DOE) was
... ›
April 03, 2023 - Bioinformatics, Healthcare, Litigation, Privacy + Data Security, United States
Applying BIPA’s Health Care Exemption to Virtual Try-On Technologies in Light of Dior Dismissal
By: Melissa M. Crespo and Morgan O'Neill Mitruka
A recent putative class action case against luxury brand Christian Dior sheds light on the health care exemption in the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA). In Delma Warmack-Stillwell v. Christian Dior Inc ., the plaintiff alleged Dior’s virtual try-on feature for sunglasses violated BIPA’s
... ›
March 28, 2023 - United States, Asia, European Union, Litigation, Intellectual Property
Recent Updates on Use of Post-filing Data as Evidence to Support Patentability
By: Liz Newman Ph.D. and Karen G Potter Ph.D.
In a “first to file” patent system as exists in the United States and in most countries throughout the world, timing of when to file a patent application is critically important but must be balanced by patentability requirements such as nonobviousness and enablement. This
... ›

Topic Archives: Litigation

Obviousness in Drug Combinations – Unexpected Results Vs. Unexpected Mechanisms of Action

By: Mark D. McBriar Ph.D., Bu Yin Ph.D. and Ashley E. Sperbeck

Mitigating Patent Risk in Gene Therapy Development

By: Daralyn Durie, Janet Xiao Ph.D. and Katherine E. McNutt

Supreme Court: U.S. Government Has Broad Discretion to Dismiss False Claims Act Suits

By: J. Alex Ward, Demme Doufekias, Adam L. Braverman and Joseph R. Palmore

Practical Strategies for Protecting Innovations Under the Doctrine of Equivalents

By: Kelsey J. Roberts Kingman Ph.D. and Bu Yin Ph.D.

Five Questions after Amgen v. Sanofi

By: Meghan McLean Poon Ph.D. and Kelsey J. Roberts Kingman Ph.D.

United States Supreme Court: Look to Defendant's Subjective Beliefs to Decide Whether It "Knowingly" Submitted False Claim

By: Joseph R. Palmore, J. Alex Ward and Adam L. Braverman

FTC Issues Notice of Penalty Offenses on Substantiation of Product Claims

By: Brigid DeCoursey Bondoc and Claudia M. Vetesi

Is DOE Now in Vogue?

By: Matthew A. Chivvis and Qiwen Zhong Ph.D.

Applying BIPA’s Health Care Exemption to Virtual Try-On Technologies in Light of Dior Dismissal

By: Melissa M. Crespo and Morgan O'Neill Mitruka

Recent Updates on Use of Post-filing Data as Evidence to Support Patentability

By: Liz Newman Ph.D. and Karen G Potter Ph.D.